Skip to main content
· 9/28/1999

Holland v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.

Citations

  • 100 F. Supp. 2d 53
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22027
  • 1999 WL 1133319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The mere fact that the FDA has not cleared a product for a particular use does not mean that the product is not in fact suitable for that purpose; it simply means that the FDA has not cleared it.”
  • even if the seller improperly promoted screws for “off-label” uses, the fact that the defendant promoted the product without permission does not tend to establish that the product was defective or unfit for its intended use, even if the intended use was forbidden by the regulatory authorities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Toole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.