Holland v. Liedel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the landlord voluntarily assumed the duty to provide security because he provided a security guard, and that tenants could therefore assume the landlord continued to monitor their security when the guard was replaced with a camera system
• although the issue whether a duty exists is generally a question of law for the court to decide, where the determination of duty depends on factual findings, those findings must be made by the jury
• although the issue whether a duty exists is generally a question of law for the court to decide, where the determination of duty depends on factual findings, those findings must be made by the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).