· 6/18/1923
Holland v. Jones-Howe Co.
Citations
- 98 N.J.L. 787
- 121 A. 725
- 1923 N.J. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evaluating circumstantial evidence of the case and characteristics of the parties
- “A factual finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” (quotation marks omitted)
- “The reviewing court— be it a district court or a court of appeals—reviews the bankruptcy court’s legal determinations de novo, its factual findings for clear error, and its exercise of discretion for abuse thereof.” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.