Skip to main content
· 6/18/1923

Holland v. Jones-Howe Co.

Citations

  • 98 N.J.L. 787
  • 121 A. 725
  • 1923 N.J. LEXIS 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evaluating circumstantial evidence of the case and characteristics of the parties
  • “A factual finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” (quotation marks omitted)
  • “The reviewing court— be it a district court or a court of appeals—reviews the bankruptcy court’s legal determinations de novo, its factual findings for clear error, and its exercise of discretion for abuse thereof.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.