Holland v. CHENEY BROS., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, “ ‘[i]n workers’ compensation cases, as in other cases, we will not consider arguments which were not presented in a meaningful way to the lower tribunal.’ ”
• stating that “we have never excused, however, the requirement that a party seeking appellate review must preserve an issue by first presenting the perceived deficiency to the [lower tribunal]”
• “Traditional rules of preservation of issues apply to workers’ compensation appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).