Holland v. Cardiff Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying federal common law to claims of executive privilege “because the state [of Maryland] and federal laws of executive privilege do not conflict” and are “substantially similar”
• “For a communication to be pre[-]decisional, it does not have to be anchored to a specific, discrete, final decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).