Supreme Court of Georgia· 8/13/1918
Holland v. Bell
Citations
- 148 Ga. 277
- 96 S.E. 419
- 1918 Ga. LEXIS 297
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Wjhere probate of the will is contested . .. for fraud and undue influence, ‘it is always proper to inquire whether the provisions of the will are just and reasonable, and accord with the state of the testator’s family relations, or the contrary.’ ” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Northwestern University v. CrispSupreme Court of Georgia· 1955-06-13· cited 58×
- Olliff v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1925-04-18· cited 30×
- Dyer v. SoutherSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-03-27· cited 17×
- Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Georgia· 1957-11-12· cited 14×
- Galloway v. HoggSupreme Court of Georgia· 1928-12-14· cited 12×
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1950-03-03· cited 11×
- Whitehead v. MalcomSupreme Court of Georgia· 1925-09-17· cited 8×
- Cook v. SheatsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1966-04-07· cited 5×
- McDaniel v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-03-07· cited 5×
- Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia· 1921-11-17· cited 5×
- Worrell v. GannsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1959-02-06· cited 3×
- Hardison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1950-02-28· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Holland v. Bell
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.