Skip to main content
· 5/7/2010

Holland v. Barfield

Citations

  • 35 So. 3d 953
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6293
  • 2010 WL 1812653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a discovery order requiring disclosure of private information on a computer hard drive and cell phone SIM card demonstrated irreparable harm
  • stating that although 10 respondents argued that petitioner had thwarted discovery by failing to produce any documents responsive to the request for production, no evidence was presented demonstrating that to be the case
  • recognizing an appellate court has certiorari jurisdiction to quash an order that – without proof there is no less intrusive method of obtaining the information – permits the respondent to examine the petitioner’s computer hard drive
  • having to disclose a computer hard drive and a cellphone SIM card demonstrates irreparable harm
  • reversing an order allowing the inspection of a computer hard drive and cellphone SIM card

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cohen, Palmer, Eyander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.