Holkesvig v. Dakota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing district court’s grant of motion to suppress because it ignored circuit precedent holding that “reasonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct” (quotation omitted)
• reversing district court’s grant of motion to suppress because it ignored circuit precedent holding that “reasonable suspicion need not rule out the possibility of innocent conduct” (quotation omitted)
• “the defendants’ truck drove over the fog line twice . . . .”
• “The objective reasonableness of an officer’s suspicion preceding any given traffic stop depends on the totality of the circumstances leading to that stop and on the traffic law at issue.”
• \the defendants' truck drove over the fog line twice ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).