· 12/7/2016
Holiday, Terrio La Joe
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the petitioner did not establish prejudice where the sought “expert testimony discussing [the peti- tioner’s] mental state, seeking to explain his behavior, or put- ting it in some favorable context would have exposed” the jury to powerful rebuttal evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.