Holiday Inns, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. C. H. Alberding, Airport Holiday Corporation, Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that defendant airport never received profits from trademark infringing inn because \[a]t no time before or during the trial on damages ... did Airport claim that it had not received profits earned by the hotel that it admittedly owned\
• 15 U.S.C. § 1117 “vests considerable discretion in the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).