· 9/9/1977
Holguin v. Elephant Butte Irrigation District
Citations
- 575 P.2d 88
- 91 N.M. 398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an attempt to litigate water rights implicating U.S./Mexico treaty could not be adjudicated without United States government
- stating that “[t]he water right is acquired by perfecting an appropriation, i.e., by an actual diversion followed by an application within a reasonable time of the water to a beneficial use” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “[Wjater belongs to the state which authorizes its use. The use may be acquired but there is no ownership in the corpus of the water.”
- judicial notice of agency rules and regulations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easley, Sosa, Payne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.