Skip to main content
· 9/9/1977

Holguin v. Elephant Butte Irrigation District

Citations

  • 575 P.2d 88
  • 91 N.M. 398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an attempt to litigate water rights implicating U.S./Mexico treaty could not be adjudicated without United States government
  • stating that “[t]he water right is acquired by perfecting an appropriation, i.e., by an actual diversion followed by an application within a reasonable time of the water to a beneficial use” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “[Wjater belongs to the state which authorizes its use. The use may be acquired but there is no ownership in the corpus of the water.”
  • judicial notice of agency rules and regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easley, Sosa, Payne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.