Holford v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that capital murder instruction substantially identical in form was not ambiguous and that, assuming it were ambiguous, any error did not cause egregious harm in light of argument of counsel and pellucid application of law in abstract section
• pointing out that both prosecutor and defense attorney argued to jury that intent to kill victim was necessary for capital murder conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).