Skip to main content
· 11/26/1990

Holert v. University of Chicago

Citations

  • 751 F. Supp. 1294
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16180
  • 1990 WL 191521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because relationship between student and university was “strictly contractual in nature, [student] was entitled only to those procedural safeguards that the [u]niversity agreed to provide”
  • relationship between university and student “strictly contractual in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conlon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.