Skip to main content
· 5/8/1968

Holdshoe v. Whinery

Citations

  • 14 Ohio St. 2d 134
  • 237 N.E.2d 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[f]urther analysis at trial of admissibility under the Rules of Evidence is not foreclosed” by a CrR 3.5 hearing determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taet, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.