Holden Norman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant “retained a degree of free movement” in a police car because he “was neither handcuffed nor forced to sit in the back seat”
• holding that stop was justifiably extended due to the driver’s “legal inability to remove the vehicle from the scene and the consequential need for a licensed driver or a tow truck to do so”
• holding that stop was justifiably extended due to the driver’s “legal inability to remove the vehicle from the scene and the consequential need for a licensed driver or a tow truck to do so”
• explaining that “complications [that] arise” during a traffic stop can justify “detain[ing] [the] driver . . . longer” (citation omitted)
• finding these facts evidenced “a degree of free movement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).