Skip to main content
· 7/21/2009

Holdeman v. Devine

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 1190
  • 47 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1397
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15986
  • 2009 WL 2151887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting it is the province of the district court to draw inferences from the evidence
  • noting it is the province of the district court to draw inferences from the evidence
  • similarly observing the existence of another “permissible” “view of the evidence” cannot mean a factual finding is clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McConnell, Ebel, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.