Holcombe v. NationsBanc Financial Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence was sufficient to go to jury on whether the danger posed by the allegedly unsafe condition — the manner in which certain partitions were stored — was foreseeable even absent proof of why the partitions fell on the plaintiff
• holding that the defendant breached its duty of care and “created a hazardous condition on its premises” by storing large, bathroom partitions by leaning them against a bathroom wall, which fell on and injured an employee
• finding danger foreseeable where partitions were stored in a bathroom despite defendant’s branch manager’s knowledge that they might “topple”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).