Holcomb v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even though California UCC furnished bank with “absolute right” to charge back check upon drawee’s dishonor, it did not shield bank from “damages due to its branch manager’s alleged negligent misrepresentations regarding the check’s status”
• “There is nothing in the [UCC] prohibiting a claim based on a depositor’s detrimental reliance on a bank employee’s incorrect statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).