Holbrook v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive, no substantial likelihood of misidentification found
• “One-on-one showups have been held to be inherently suggestive, especially where, as here, the accused is a lone suspect who is obviously M custody, surrounded by uniformed police officers, and no precaution is taken to ensure the integrity of the identification process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-03-18· cited 14×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-03-09· cited 13×
• Parks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-11-18· cited 10×
• Abrams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-11-04· cited 9×
• Hooper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-09-13· cited 7×
• Doublette v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-04-12· cited 6×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-13· cited 3×
• Pullins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-08-08· cited 2×
• Sorrells v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-04-18
• James Pullins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-08-08
• Kenneth Ray Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-03-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• McCoy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-10· cited 31×
• Killens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-10-20· cited 24×
• Holbrook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-10-12· cited 24×
• Cline v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-02-22· cited 11×
• Stinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-11-21· cited 9×
• Banks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-03-12· cited 7×