Holbert v. Chase

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Iowa’s statute requiring early disclosure of expert witnesses did not conflict with Rule 26
• finding no direct conflict between state statute requiring early disclosure of expert witnesses in professional liability cases and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4)(A)(i), concluding the state statute went beyond the requirements of the Federal Rule, but did not conflict with it
• finding no conflict between Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(i) and Iowa statute requiring plaintiff in a professional liability case to certify to the court and other parties the expert’s name, qualifications, and the purpose for calling the expert within 180 days of the defendant’s answer
• Iowa’s statutory requirement of early disclosure of expert witnesses in professional malpractice cases did not conflict with Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(i)
• Iowa’s statutory requirement of early disclosure of expert witnesses in professional malpractice cases did not conflict with the expert-disclosure requirements of Rule 26(b)(4)(A)(1)
• Iowa’s statutory requirement of early disclosure of expert witnesses in professional malpractice cases did not conflict with Fed. R.Civ.P. 26(b) (4) (A) (i)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).