· 4/5/2005
Hokyung \Harrison\ Kim v. Co-Operative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A.
Citations
- 364 F. Supp. 2d 346
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5963
- 2005 WL 820487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a New York court would look to the law of Singapore to determine the preclusive effect of a Singaporean judgment
- \Recognition may be denied if the opposing party can prove . . . that the foreign judgment is repugnant to the public policy of this state.\
- in a case applying Singapore substantive law, declining to apply Singapore law in a way that would refer the court back to, and require it to apply, New York substantive law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sprizzo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.