Skip to main content
· 4/5/2005

Hokyung \Harrison\ Kim v. Co-Operative Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A.

Citations

  • 364 F. Supp. 2d 346
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5963
  • 2005 WL 820487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a New York court would look to the law of Singapore to determine the preclusive effect of a Singaporean judgment
  • \Recognition may be denied if the opposing party can prove . . . that the foreign judgment is repugnant to the public policy of this state.\
  • in a case applying Singapore substantive law, declining to apply Singapore law in a way that would refer the court back to, and require it to apply, New York substantive law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sprizzo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.