Hoke v. Miami Valley Hosp.

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 3387

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying the appellants' motion for a new trial in this medical-malpractice action. The appellants' 17 arguments did not demonstrate grounds for a new trial under Civ.R. 59. The trial court did not err in denying the appellants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The jurors answered interrogatories indicating appellants had not proven that the appellees were negligent. Based on the evidence presented, reasonable minds could find that the appellants failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that any of the appellees were negligent. The jury's verdict in favor of the appellees was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.