· 3/8/1995
Hoke v. May Department Stores Co.
Citations
- 891 P.2d 686
- 133 Or. App. 410
- 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 655
- 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 441
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an affidavit stating that an expert would testify to the reasonableness of the defendant’s conduct was adequate evidence to preclude summary judgment on a negligence claim
- reversing summary judgment for defendant on claim that it was negligent in hiring and retaining a security guard with a history of sex- ual assault and who had assaulted the plaintiff customer
- attorney filed general affidavit but argued on appeal that expert would testify about specific issue
- attorney filed general affidavit but argued on appeal that expert would testify about specific issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riggs, De Muniz Leeson, Leeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.