Hokanson v. Lichtor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the majority of authority from other jurisdictions holds that no civil cause of action for damages exists for . . . perjury”
• \The purpose of K.S.A. 60-212[b][6] is to dismiss legally insufficient pleadings even though everything they plead is taken as true.\
• “immaterial ... [that] proceedings terminated in favor of person instituting or initiating them,” quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 682 cmt. a (1977)
• refusing to recognize a civil action for perjury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).