Hokama v. University of Hawaii

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that twenty-day limitations period for filing grievances under contract “should not operate to automatically bar” the plaintiffs claims where the plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies was reasonable under the circumstances
• consulting federal precedent to aid interpretation of public employment laws under HRS § 89
• arbitrators \normally have broad discretion to fashion appropriate remedies\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).