Hogue v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• saying that “no error is preserved” as to this ground because Hogue “voiced no objection to this aspect of the court’s charge”
• finding that the veniremember’s answers as a whole showed that he would follow the law and hold the State to its burden of proving venue
• no due process violation where record fairly supports the basis of comparative rulings on challenges for cause.
• no due process violation where record fairly supports the basis of comparative rulings on challenges for cause.
• “We fail to see how the wording of the indictment, although not grammatically correct, misled or confused appellant.”
• capital murder/arson indictment need not further plead acts constituting arson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).