Hogue v. Ameron, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Gertz decision left open the question of whether the defamation per se concept remained in the law with respect to actions against non-media defendants
• stating that the Gertz decision left open the question of whether the defamation per se concept remained in the law with respect to actions against non-media defendants
• slight evidence of damage sufficient to get to jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).