Hogan v. Russ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where a plaintiff’s only allegation is that the defendant-doctor made a wrongful diagnosis and recommendation, defendant’s actions fail to constitute deliberate indifference and at best, would rise only to the level of negligence
• offering extraction, but refusing to provide specialized dental care by a periodontist at state expense pursuant to prison policy, did not establish deliberate indifference
• \[T]he state's interest in efficiently distributing its limited resources is sufficient reason not to provide extensive specialized medical care for inmates.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).