Hogan v. O'NEILL

Citations

• 255 U.S. 52
• 41 S. Ct. 222
• 65 L. Ed. 497
• 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1839

Syllabus

<p>1. For the purposes of interstate rendition (Rev. Stats., §5278), an indictment which omits otherwise to allege the place of the offense lays it sufficiently in the demanding State if its caption designates a court and county of that State and a law of that State (Mass. Rev. Laws, e. 218, § 20) makes such designation equivalent to an allegation that the act was committed within the territorial jurisdiction of such court. P. 54.</p> <p>2. Laws of a demanding State affecting the right to rendition are noticed by federal courts and may be noticed by the Governor of the State upon whom demand is made. P. 55.</p> <p>3. In Massachusetts, as at common law, a conspiracy to commit a crime is itself a criminal offense, although ño overt act be done in ■ pursuance of it. Id.</p> <p>4. A person duly charged in the demanding State who was present there when the offense is alleged to have been committed and after-wards departed, although not for the purpose of escaping prosecution, to another State, is a fugitive from justice, under Rév. Stats., § 5278; Constitution, Art. IV, § 2. Id.</p> <p>5. Whether the. person demanded is in fact a fugitive is for determination by the Governor of the State upon which demand is made, whose conclusion, evinced by the warrant of arrest, must stand, in habeas corpus, unless clearly overthrown. P. 56.</p>