Hogan v. Mayor &C. of Savannah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the injured party attempted to collect insurance premiums under a corporate policy, the court rejected the reverse piercing argument
• where closely held corporation was “named insured,” president, chairman of board, treasurer, general counsel and shareholder of corporation could not be deemed either named insured or a family member in relation thereto
• party could not “reverse pierce” the corporate veil to have the corporation’s president, rather than the corporation, listed as the named insured in an insurance contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).