Oregon Supreme Court· 8/6/1958
Hogan v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp.
Citations
- 329 P.2d 271
- 214 Or. 218
- 1958 Ore. LEXIS 246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here is no agreement until the offer has been accepted in accordance with its very terms.”
- “[T]here is no agreement until the offer has been accepted in accordance with its very terms.”
- “[T]here is no agreement until the offer has been accepted in accordance with its very terms.”
- “[i]t is hornbook law that the existence of a contract is grounded on offer and acceptance and there is no agreement until the offer has been accepted in accordance with its very terms”
- \[i]t is hornbook law that the existence of a contract is grounded on offer and acceptance and there is no agreement until the offer has been accepted in accordance with its very terms\
- notice to agent is notice to principal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perry, Warner, McAllister, Sloan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 64×
- Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court· 2015-04-30· cited 34×
- Adams v. Crater Well Drilling, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-11-26· cited 22×
- GPL Treatment, Ltd. v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-04-11· cited 20×
- Malbco Holdings, LLC v. Amco InsuranceD. Oregon· 2009-04-29· cited 19×
- Burlington Northern Inc. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-10-06· cited 13×
- Burkholder v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1965-12-22· cited 12×
- Benson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 8×
- Schlegel v. DoranOregon Supreme Court· 1971-11-05· cited 7×
- Pacific Photocopy, Inc. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-06-16· cited 5×
- Spada Properties, Inc. v. Unified Grocers, Inc.D. Oregon· 2014-08-15· cited 5×
- Tri-Met, Inc. v. OdighizuwaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-03-18· cited 4×
- H. D. Fowler Co. v. Medical Research FoundationOregon Supreme Court· 1964-06-24· cited 3×
- Clark v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1972-12-01· cited 3×
- R. J. Taggart, Inc. v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-12-12· cited 2×
- Creager v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-06-28· cited 2×
- Carter v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court· 1958-11-05· cited 2×
- State v. BurssCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-06-24· cited 1×
- CRM Collateral v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictD. Oregon· 2010-05-26
- DCBS v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-16
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.