Skip to main content
· 2/28/1994

Hogan, Lepore & Hogan v. Pequea Township Zoning Board

Citations

  • 638 A.2d 464
  • 162 Pa. Commw. 282
  • 1994 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although the record of a zoning hearing was closed to further substantive evidence, a later board meeting at which counsel offered oral argument constituted the final hearing for purposes of Section 908(9)
  • holding that, although the record of a zoning hearing was closed to further substantive evidence, a later board meeting at which counsel offered oral argument constituted the final hearing for purposes of Section 908(9)
  • finding board did not abuse its discretion in fixing separate hearing solely for purpose of considering legal argument
  • “even if Hogan otherwise would have been entitled to a deemed approval of its special exception application, it waived its right to that deemed approval by failing to object to the previously announced argument date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Smith, Kelton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.