Skip to main content
· 4/6/1942

Hoffmeister v. Hoffmeister

Citations

  • 264 A.D. 724
  • 34 N.Y.S.2d 522
  • 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding employees to be in privity with employers for the purposes of res judicata
  • “For purposes of issue or claim preclusion, summary judgment is considered a decision on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.