Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1/9/1979
Hoffman v. Ralston Purina Co.
Citations
- 273 N.W.2d 214
- 86 Wis. 2d 445
- 1979 Wisc. LEXIS 2012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding check for seven months without communicating rejection of offer was an unreasonable length of time and constitutes acceptance
- finding acceptance where offeree accepted benefits of offer but never expressly accepted and, in fact, said he would not accept
- “The question is not the actual intent of the offeree, but his manifested intent. Actions of the offeree can constitute acceptance even when accompanying words express a contrary intent.”
- accord and satisfaction only if there is a sufficient expression to make creditor understand that the sum is in satisfaction of disputed claim
- “The question is not the actual intent of the offeree, but his manifested intent.”
- “There must be expressions sufficient to make the creditor understand or to make it unreasonable for him not to understand that the performance is offered in full satisfaction of the claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heffernan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1994-06-17· cited 34×
- Van Sistine v. TollardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-03-26· cited 30×
- State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-02-25· cited 21×
- State v. Ryan M. MuthWisconsin Supreme Court· 2020-07-07· cited 14×
- BV/B1, LLC v. InvestorsBankCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2010-10-26· cited 12×
- Wells Fargo Business Credit v. Donald HindmanSeventh Circuit· 2013-10-30· cited 11×
- Rockwood Manufacturing Corp. v. Amp, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1986-12-03· cited 10×
- Advance Concrete Forms, Inc. v. McCann Construction Specialties CompanySeventh Circuit· 1990-10-23· cited 9×
- Union Realty Company, Ltd. v. Stephen D. Moses and Arnold L. PorathSixth Circuit· 1993-02-19· cited 9×
- Quirk v. Atlanta Stove Works, Inc.E.D. Wisconsin· 1982-04-22· cited 6×
- Jeffery Pruett v. WESTconsin Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2023-10-24· cited 4×
- Perritt Limited Partnership, an Illinois Limited Partnership v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1Seventh Circuit· 1998-08-21· cited 3×
- Oppedahl & Larson v. Network Solutions, Inc.D. Colorado· 1998-04-16· cited 3×
- Schuetta v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.E.D. Wisconsin· 2014-05-08· cited 3×
- Pandeli v. MAJESZCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2005-02-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.