Skip to main content
· 12/16/2013

Hoffman v. Disciplinary Bd. of the Supreme Court of N. Dakota

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 831
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 687
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3364
  • 571 U.S. 1111
  • 2013 WL 5761190
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 9147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing ministerial duties are amenable to Ex parte Young claims
  • “[I]n the ballot access context, freedom of association claims and equal protection claims are nearly identical.”
  • “An as applied challenge is a claim that the operation of a statute is unconstitutional in a particular case while a facial challenge indicates that the statute may rarely or never be constitutionally applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.