Hoffman v. Asseenontv. Com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \'conclusory and self- serving assertions' in certifications without explanatory or supporting facts will not defeat a meritorious motion for summary judgment\ (quoting Puder v. Buechel, 183 N.J. 428, 440-41 (2005))
• noting that a court’s “focus must not be on what prompted the suit but what action [the alleged wrongdoer] engaged in after commencement of the action”
• noting that a court’s “focus must not be on what prompted the suit but what action [the alleged wrongdoer] engaged in after commencement of the action”
• explaining that \'conclusory and self-serving assertions' in certifications without explanatory or supporting facts will not defeat a meritorious motion for summary judgment\ (quoting Puder v. Buechel, 183 N.J. 428, 440 (2005))
• noting \[c]ompetent opposition [to summary judgment] requires 'competent evidential material' beyond mere 'speculation' and 'fanciful arguments'\
• Merchs. Express Money Order Co. v. Sun Nat'l Bank, 374 N.J. Super. 556, 563 (App. Div. 2005)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).