Hoffer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply federal interpretation of a federal securities law to similar Washington securities law
• declining to apply federal interpretation of a federal securities law to similar Washington securities law
• reaffirming the substantial contributing factor test after the Supreme Court adopted a strict privity test for federal securities law in Pinter v. Dahl, 486 U.S. 622, 108 S.Ct. 2063, 100 L.Ed.2d 658 (1988)
• “[The Act] has a different purpose than the federal statute, in that it endeavors to protect investors, not just the integrity of the marketplace.”
• although the Supreme Court’s construction of a similarly worded statute is often persuasive, it is not controlling in our interpretation of a state statute
• although the Supreme Court's construction of a similarly worded statute is often persuasive, it is not controlling in our interpretation of a state statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Stiley v. Block
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-10-24· cited 226×
• Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-09-10· cited 185×
• Schaaf v. Highfield
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 175×
• FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-07-17· cited 158×
• Connecticut National Bank v. Giacomi
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-22· cited 138×
• Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 137×
• Kinney v. Cook
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-03-22· cited 122×
• Colonial Imports, Inc. v. Carlton Northwest, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 100×
• Yurtis v. Phipps
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-01· cited 74×
• In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation
  D. Arizona· 1989-09-05· cited 68×
• Chen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-05-16· cited 62×
• Bird-Johnson Corp. v. Dana Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 54×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-02-04· cited 47×
• Syrovy v. Alpine Resources, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-10-07· cited 47×
• Douglas Northwest, Inc. v. Bill O'Brien & Sons Construction, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-13· cited 46×
• Kearney v. Kearney
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-09· cited 46×
• State v. Catlett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-10-16· cited 45×
• Fondren v. Klickitat County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-11-21· cited 41×
• Aviation West Corp. v. Department of Labor & Industries
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 40×
• Cellular Engineering, Ltd. v. O'Neill
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 35×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pinter v. Dahl
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 784×
• Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 400×
• State v. Gore
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-04-26· cited 316×
• Hoffer v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-05-12· cited 171×
• Weeks v. Chief of Washington State Patrol
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 51×
• State v. Eaves
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-11-26· cited 23×