Hoffar v. Dement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that resolving an issue in favor of the appellant in the absence of evidence in the record “would be purely speculative.”
• concluding that in the absence of the instruction recommended in Brooks, instruction that did not misstate the law was not error
• stating that a defendant’s failure to satisfy one of the elements “negates a court’s need to consider the other”
• stating that a defendant’s failure to satisfy one of the elements “negates a court’s need to consider the other.”
• stating that a defendant’s failure to satisfy one of the elements “negates a court’s need to consider the other”
• stating that a defendant’s failure to satisfy one of the elements “negates a court’s need to consider the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).