· 7/15/1845
Hoey v. Furman
Citations
- 1 Pa. 295
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there was no probable cause in a prosecution under § 2C:33-4.1 but treating the statute as valid
- discussing these concepts in the context of a conviction for retaliation against a witness, N.J.S.A. 2C:28-5(b)
- applying the same standard to Facebook posts to determine \whether [the] defendant's speech is protected by the First Amendment\ in a cyber harassment and witness retaliation prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.