Skip to main content
· 7/15/1845

Hoey v. Furman

Citations

  • 1 Pa. 295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was no probable cause in a prosecution under § 2C:33-4.1 but treating the statute as valid
  • discussing these concepts in the context of a conviction for retaliation against a witness, N.J.S.A. 2C:28-5(b)
  • applying the same standard to Facebook posts to determine \whether [the] defendant's speech is protected by the First Amendment\ in a cyber harassment and witness retaliation prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.