Hoeveler v. Mugele

Citations

• 66 Pa. 348
• 1871 Pa. LEXIS 40

Syllabus

<p>1. In an action on a bond for purchase-money of land, evidence for defendant, that the land was to be the basis of an oil and mining company, that the sum secured was to be paid when realized from the sale of stock or if the stock could not be sold from the products of the land, was admissible.</p> <p>2. The jury found for the plaintiff, “the lien, &c., of the judgment to be confined to the proceeds of sale of the stock and products of the land,” &c. Held to bo proper.</p> <p>3. Aycinena v. Feries, 6 W. & S. 243, Irwin v. Shoemaker, 8 Id. 75, recognised.</p>