Hoerner v. First National Bank of Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding proof of Hoerner’s actual approval was unnecessary because Hoerner’s “acceptance of the benefits flowing from [the loans] could not be other than an implied approval by operation of law ”
• “We are of the opinion that Hoerner is now estopped.... ”
• applying quasi-estoppel to a breach-of-guaranty claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).