Hoeppel v. Westover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding systematic discrimination proven where computer program which selected jurors pulled names from only two zip codes in the county, excluding a highly-populated geographic area with a 90% African-American population
• finding a systematic “underrepresentation” of African Ameri cans in the Kent County jury venire, which satisfied the petitioner’s burden under the second and third prongs of Duren

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).