Hoehner v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating as separate issues the defendant’s arguments, first, that there was insufficient evidence to infer the existence of a contract between the plaintiff and a third party and, second, that the statute of frauds invalidated that contract
• treating as separate issues the defendant's arguments, first, that there was insufficient evidence to infer the existence of a contract between the plaintiff and a third party and, second, that the statute of frauds invalidated that contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).