Hoehmann v. Town of Clarkstown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that there is no need for felony-by-felony litigation regarding the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1)” under the Second Amendment
• concluding “that there is no need for felony-by-felony litigation regarding the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1)” under the Second Amendment
• explaining that § 922(g)(1) is consistent with the nation’s history and tradition
• surveying historical examples and concluding § 922(g)(1) comported with this Nation’s history of firearm regulation
• placing the burden on the defendant to show “that his prior felony conviction is insufficient to justify the” stripping of Second Amendment rights
• allowing the disarming of anyone who has “disrespect for the legal norms of society”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).