Hoechst Diafoil Company v. Nan Ya Plastics Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in predicting how a state's highest court 5 As the Third Circuit recognized in Pittston Co. Ultramar American Limited v. Allianz Insurance Co., 124 F.3d 508, 516 n.9 (3d Cir. 1997
• requiring that the \district court . . . fix a bond whenever it grants a preliminary injunction or restraining order\
• noting that a TRO “preserve[s] the status quo only until a preliminary injunction hearing can be held”
• requiring that the \district court . . . fix a bond whenever it grants a preliminary injunction or restraining order\
• noting that “[i]n some circumstances, a nominal bond may suffice” and citing a case in which the bond was set at $0
• remanding where injunction order “makes no significant factual findings and states only that the court deems the issuance of the injunction ‘necessary and proper’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).