Skip to main content
· 6/17/1992

Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance

Citations

  • 623 A.2d 1133
  • 1992 Del. Super. LEXIS 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that declaratory judgment will only be granted where an actual controversy exists So that judicial resources are not wasted on “situations in which a judicial declaration will not end the dispute between the parties”
  • explaining that the parties must have real and adverse interests
  • in products liability action, evidence showed that there was reasonable likelihood that excess insurance policies would be triggered
  • “ripeness . . . is now very much a matter of practical common sense[.]”
  • “The declaratory judgment statute, 10 Del. C. § 6501, does not create any substantive rights but merely provides a procedural means for securing judicial relief in an expeditious and comprehensive manner.”
  • insured need not have suffered actual harm for declaratory action to be ripe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gebelein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.