Skip to main content
· 1/18/2008

Hodson v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLP

Citations

  • 531 F. Supp. 2d 827
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7382
  • 2008 WL 191062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that filing a collection action was not inconsistent with intent to arbitrate an FDCPA dispute
  • “[F]iling collection actions in municipal court . . . does not satisfy th[e] standard” to find waiver of arbitration.
  • compelling arbitration of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claims against law firm as the credit card lender’s “authorized representative”
  • granting third-party debt collector’s motion to compel FDCPA claims to arbitration
  • “Congress did not intend FDCPA claims to be non-arbi-trable. Courts routinely permit arbitration of such claims.”
  • “Congress did not intend FDCPA claims to be non-arbitrable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kathleen McDonald O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.