Skip to main content
· 5/10/2011

Hodnett v. Stanco Masonry, Inc.

Citations

  • 708 S.E.2d 429
  • 58 Va. App. 244
  • 2011 Va. App. LEXIS 161

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the commission did not rule on appellant's due process argument, this Court could not consider the issue on appeal
  • holding that a claimant’s argument was not preserved because he did not present it to the Commission
  • holding that Court could not consider appellant’s due process argument because Commission did not rule on it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys, McClanahan, Beales

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.