· 3/13/1978
Hodgin v. Jefferson
Citations
- 447 F. Supp. 804
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19078
- 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8473
- 17 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s actions are unauthorized by the employer when, “reading the complaint liberally, it appears [the] plaintiff has charged that [the defendant] ignored the stated policies” of the employer
- finding that sex discrimination can qualify as a basis for a § 1985(3) conspiracy
- claims based on § 3 of the Equal Pay Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northrop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.