Skip to main content
· 3/13/1978

Hodgin v. Jefferson

Citations

  • 447 F. Supp. 804
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19078
  • 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8473
  • 17 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s actions are unauthorized by the employer when, “reading the complaint liberally, it appears [the] plaintiff has charged that [the defendant] ignored the stated policies” of the employer
  • finding that sex discrimination can qualify as a basis for a § 1985(3) conspiracy
  • claims based on § 3 of the Equal Pay Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.