Hodges v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here the writing is not plain and unambiguous and is such as to require the aid of parole evidence and the parole evidence is conflicting or may lead to more than one conclusion, the doubtful parts may be submitted to the fact-finder for resolution.”
• “[W]here the writing is not plain and unambiguous and is such as to require the aid of parole evidence and the parole evidence is conflicting or may lead to - 10 - more than one conclusion, the doubtful parts may be submitted to the fact-finder for resolution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).